{"id":9095,"date":"2026-04-13T14:37:35","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T14:37:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/uncategorized\/bitcoin-retreats-amid-oil-inflation-macro-pressure\/"},"modified":"2026-04-13T14:37:36","modified_gmt":"2026-04-13T14:37:36","slug":"bitcoin-retreats-amid-oil-inflation-macro-pressure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/news\/bitcoin-news\/bitcoin-retreats-amid-oil-inflation-macro-pressure\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin slips from $74,000 peak as macro pressures reassert themselves"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On April 12, bitcoin last traded around $71,000, according to The Block\u2019s price data, after retreating from resistance near $74,000 over the weekend. Ether hovered around $2,190, with broader crypto markets also weaker. The move followed the breakdown of U.S.-Iran talks and heightened White House rhetoric over a potential naval blockade linked to the Strait of Hormuz.<\/p>\n<h2>Macro narrative and market positioning<\/h2>\n<p>QCP Capital wrote that markets had hoped for a ceasefire deal but were positioned for disappointment, noting that bitcoin met resistance at $74,000 as crude oil pushed back above $100 and risk appetite faded. The firm said the market is now trading \u201cexecution, not headlines,\u201d with the credibility of any blockade enforcement becoming part of the trade.<\/p>\n<p>Several analysts emphasized that the pullback has not yet evolved into panic. Nexo described the \u201cceasefire-driven relief trade\u201d as unwinding, but said forced selling remains relatively contained. The firm pointed to nearly $1 billion in spot bitcoin ETF inflows last week and liquidation activity still running well below first-quarter norms, suggesting the weekend shock was absorbed more smoothly than earlier in the year.<\/p>\n<p>Multiple commentators framed bitcoin\u2019s performance as increasingly tied to macro dynamics rather than idiosyncratic crypto drivers. Simon Massabni of XS.com said the rally on softer inflation data lacked a strong enough foundation to persist, while Capital.com\u2019s Kyle Rodda characterized the current backdrop as a return to a playbook of \u201coil up\u201d and risk assets under pressure.<\/p>\n<h2>Overhead supply and cleaner leverage<\/h2>\n<p>Timothy Misir, head of research at BRN, said bitcoin\u2019s recovery above $70,000 is notable, but that each move into the $70,000\u2013$80,000 range continues to trigger profit-taking. He estimated that around 13.5 million addresses remain underwater, leaving substantial overhead supply despite improving institutional flows. Glassnode data aligns with this view, showing an elevated number of addresses in loss and spot prices still below key short-term cost-basis clusters.<\/p>\n<p>Leverage conditions appear more restrained than in the first quarter. FalconX\u2019s Martin Gaspar said aggregate futures open interest ended March at $56.5 billion, down 54% from the October 2025 peak and back near mid-2024 levels, indicating that excess leverage has largely been flushed out. He added that bitcoin\u2019s resilience in early April suggests the deleveraging phase may be nearing completion, even though macro shocks can still disrupt recovery.<\/p>\n<p>Options markets echo a similar tone. Laser Digital observed that implied volatility briefly rose during the run to $74,000 and subsequent selloff, but then retreated, with BTC implied volatility around 45. QCP noted that implied vols and risk reversals have drifted back toward pre-conflict levels, indicating lingering uncertainty but diminished panic.<\/p>\n<p>The macro backdrop remains central. U.S. March CPI rose 3.3% year over year, up from 2.4% in February, as the Iran-related energy shock filtered into prices. Analysts said inflation has reaccelerated enough to keep the Federal Reserve cautious, while growth is not strong enough to justify a more hawkish stance, leaving bitcoin weaker than at its recent peak but firmer than a full macro unwind might imply.<\/p>\n<h2>FAQ<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Why did bitcoin pull back from nearly $74,000?<\/strong><br \/>Bitcoin retreated as hopes for a Middle East ceasefire faded, U.S.-Iran talks broke down, and oil prices moved back above $100, reigniting inflation concerns and weakening risk appetite.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How is leverage positioned in the bitcoin market now?<\/strong><br \/>According to FalconX, aggregate futures open interest fell to $56.5 billion at the end of March, down 54% from the October 2025 peak and near mid-2024 levels, suggesting excess leverage has largely been reduced.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What do analysts say about current bitcoin volatility?<\/strong><br \/>Laser Digital and QCP reported that implied volatility briefly spiked but has reverted, with BTC implied volatility around 45 and risk reversals back near pre-conflict levels, indicating expectations for choppy range trading rather than a decisive breakout.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How are ETF flows and liquidations affecting market sentiment?<\/strong><br \/>Nexo highlighted nearly $1 billion in spot bitcoin ETF inflows last week and liquidation levels below first-quarter norms, indicating that the market has absorbed recent macro shocks without significant forced selling.<\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n  \"mainEntity\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Why did bitcoin pull back from nearly $74,000?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Bitcoin retreated as hopes for a Middle East ceasefire faded, U.S.-Iran talks broke down, and oil prices moved back above $100, reigniting inflation concerns and weakening risk appetite.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How is leverage positioned in the bitcoin market now?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"According to FalconX, aggregate futures open interest fell to $56.5 billion at the end of March, down 54% from the October 2025 peak and near mid-2024 levels, suggesting excess leverage has largely been reduced.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"What do analysts say about current bitcoin volatility?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Laser Digital and QCP reported that implied volatility briefly spiked but has reverted, with BTC implied volatility around 45 and risk reversals back near pre-conflict levels, indicating expectations for choppy range trading rather than a decisive breakout.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How are ETF flows and liquidations affecting market sentiment?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Nexo highlighted nearly $1 billion in spot bitcoin ETF inflows last week and liquidation levels below first-quarter norms, indicating that the market has absorbed recent macro shocks without significant forced selling.\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On April 12, bitcoin last traded around $71,000, according to The Block\u2019s price data, after retreating from resistance near $74,000 over the weekend. Ether hovered around $2,190, with broader crypto markets also weaker. The move followed the breakdown of U.S.-Iran talks and heightened White House rhetoric over a potential naval blockade linked to the Strait [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":9094,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bitcoin-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9095"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9095\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9096,"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9095\/revisions\/9096"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9094"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/otetmarkets.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}